Why are bartenders responsible for offenses committed by drunks?

If one was to look at all of my friends, they'd best be described as an eclectic collection overall. I'm not one to conform to any specific group of people. I like most of them except for the few individuals that give me good reason not too. That being said, the link here is for an article in today's ADN entitled "Police target drunks in bars and employees who serve them". (Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/01/08/2252919/police-crack-down-on-bar-drunkenness.html#storylink=cpy")
Almost a dozen of my friends, from many different walks of life, posted the link and included outrage at the idea of the police spending their time on this. Only a couple of them actually work in a bar, so they got my attention.

First, a note on why I have something to say. I taught the Technique's of Alcohol Management, one of the server's courses here in Alaska for several years beginning in the mid-90's. These are required to obtain a TAM or TIPS card to be able to serve alcohol and work in a licensed establishment (like a bar or liquor store).

Now, the article talks about stings, which the police have been doing on and off for 20 years now. I've never been a fan of the Alcohol laws here in Alaska which is one reason I made it a point to learn them. What the police in the article are doing is legal, and it is an issue we used to stress during the 4 hour course years ago. All of the liability is on the server and the establishment. Thank the lawyers and your legislature for this one kiddies.

This is how we got here.

The Party -
Jimmy Joe Johnson is over 21, normally responsible, a good guy, and likes to go out and party with his buds. They like to bar hop. In the course of the night, they party hard, drink a lot of beer and shots at 4 or 5 places. He's pretty big, so the alcohol fails to have any obvious debilitating effects for the first few hours. Jimmy Joe is a friendly lug and everyone really likes him. He seems okay as they get to the last bar for the night and everyone passes inspection at the door. They go inside and the party continues. Pretty soon, the night's revelry takes hold and it's obvious he has had enough. The staff thanks him for his business and sends him out the door. They are concerned about him and pout him in a cab that the bar pays for.

The Bad Decision-
He has the cab go around the corner and then hops out and into his truck. He feels fine and just cannot see leaving his truck to get vandalized or having to cab it back tomorrow to pick it up. He drives home, convinced all is well.

Outcome #1 -
Jimmie Joe gets out on the highway, misjudges a turn because he is too drunk, and rolls his truck. He does not survive leaving a wife and child behind.
Someone has to pay! Someone has to be held responsible! We cannot hold him responsible, he's dead. Who will take care of the wife and child left behind? SOMEONE MUST PAY! OOO, the bar must makes lots of money, we'll sue them, and the servers working that night. Someone is bound to have money that will help his widow and baby.

Outcome #2 -
Jimmie Joe gets out on the highway, crosses the center-line, and kills Billy Jack and himself in a head-on collision. Billie Jack's never been in a bar, he's an 20 year old man with his whole life ahead of him. Jimmie Joe does not survive leaving a wife and child behind.

Someone has to pay! Someone has to be held responsible! We cannot hold him responsible, he's dead. Who will take care of the wife and child left behind? SOMEONE MUST PAY! That bar must makes lots of money, we'll sue them, and the servers working that night. Someone is bound to have money that will help his widow and baby. What about Billie Jack, he was innocent! Someone has to pay his family for their loss.

Now, both of these occurrences actually happen far too often. It is truly sad. But our society has taken to removing the blame from individuals and blaming their environment, or society, or someone else. We are no longer responsible for our own decisions.

It gets worse:
Dram shop liability (Third-Party liability) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dram_shop
"Generally, dram shop laws establish the liability of establishments arising out of the sale of alcohol to visibly intoxicated persons or minors who subsequently cause death or injury to third-parties (those not having a relationship to the bar) as a result of alcohol-related car crashes and other accidents."

Now, I feel very sad for anyone who loses someone they love, and especially sad if it is due conditions like these. But please make an effort to place the blame appropriately.

I know there is a lot to read here, but some things to take away. Please be understanding if you're asked to leave a bar. The laws are so NOT written in bar's favor and if they are shutdown, all of their employees (some of your friends) are out of work. They are protecting their jobs and fellow co-workers. They are NOT usually the power hungry automatons the uninformed like to accuse them of being.

If you agree that these laws remove or negate the personal responsibility of the offender, then lobby to get them changed!

New Intersections in our Neighborhood

Here's an intersection near my house (http://goo.gl/aW7SZ courtesy of Google Maps)

Notice how the corners are curved in? It's done to make the crosswalk shorter and hopefully reduce the number of pedestrian accidents. I guess this has been a bad corner in the past.

A side-effect of this design is the loss of 8 or more parking spaces on the street close to the corner. For the owners of those houses on the corner, they now have to find somewhere else to park, or do they? It seems they really don't care if they block traffic.

I'm sure you can tell that even on the straighter section of street, there is just enough room to park on both sides and allow two cars to pass driving up the street while each trying to keep to their side of the road. (Imagine this in Winter when the people who live here fail to remove the snow on the street in front of their homes, but park there anyway. They are often almost in the middle of the street.) Once you get to the top of the curve on each corner, there is barely room for one large vehicle to pass if both sides are blocked. In fact, if there is on coming traffic as you make your turn, there is no where to go.

I know they are trying to make it safer for pedestrians, but in an obviously high traffic area, they have made it more dangerous for the drivers. Even more so when the corner residents attempt to claim the parking in front of their house.

The magic question, what would you do if YOU frequent this intersection?

Separate rules for everyone?

This is a pointer to the following CNET article:

Facebook blocks a second contact export tool
by Stephen Shankland

Read more: http://goo.gl/HVJDo

After all of Facebook's efforts to prevent this activity, and also after the shut down the API that Open-Xchange uses, why is Yahoo still allowed to pull this info with email addresses but other apps are not even permitted to pull the first and last name?

Read the article in full and tell me what you think?